Why Do the Wizards Hate Animals in Wicked: Part One?

by

As a gamer with a penchant for immersive storytelling and a keen eye for social commentary, I found myself utterly captivated by Jeff Goldblum’s enigmatic portrayal of the Wizard in Wicked: Part One. The intricate web of prejudice woven into the narrative was nothing short of masterful, and it resonated deeply with my own experiences.

Audience members find themselves captivated by Jeff Goldblum’s character as a wizard in Wicked: Part One, and his seemingly antagonistic attitude towards animals. Although the film focuses on the strong friendship between Glinda and Elphaba, it also subtly unveils Oz’s increasing animosity towards animals, several of whom lose their ability to communicate. This has ignited a sense of wonder about the origin of this bigotry.

Here’s a breakdown of key events and why Wizards hate animals in Wicked.

Why Wicked: Part One’s wizards hate animals

The Wizard fosters division in Oz by framing animals as enemies.

In the movie, an impactful moment showcases discrimination towards animals. Professor Dr. Dillamond, a goat character portrayed by Peter Dinklage at Shiz University, reveals a disturbing message on his blackboard: “Animals should be seen and not heard.” This statement leaves the audience shocked, leading to speculation about who penned this hateful remark.

In this instance, we can see how the Wizard manipulates the perceptions of his subjects in Oz. He disseminates misleading information to depict animals as dangerous adversaries. Yet, despite their intentions for peaceful cohabitation, the Wizard portrays them negatively. By stoking fear, he utilizes these animals as scapegoats for Oz’s problems, such as the Great Drought that came close to annihilating the Emerald City.

In simpler terms, Jeff Goldblum’s character suggests that people tend to unite when there’s a common threat. He uses animals as this enemy in the story, thereby gaining control over the human inhabitants of Oz due to their mutual dislike. Over the course of the tale, these animals gradually lose their ability to speak, which symbolizes their increasing marginalization and powerlessness.

As a fervent admirer, I’d say this narrative beautifully mirrors the harsh reality of real-life discrimination. Silencing the creatures represents a stripping away of their freedoms and their capacity to resist. The Wizard, in turn, cleverly orchestrates the populace, channeling their frustration towards the animals rather than challenging his power.

The final destination for these creatures is yet undecided. Nevertheless, Wicked: Part One lays the groundwork for a more intense struggle in the upcoming sequel, scheduled to be released in 2025.

Read More

2024-11-30 05:40