Unveiling the Cult of Self: How Returning to Faith Could Save Our Collapsing Culture

In simpler terms, as another wise thinker, Bruce Lee, noted, once you truly grasp the issue at hand, the answer becomes clear. Given that abandoning Christianity seems to have led us into a world resembling a circus (Clown World), it seems logical that returning to Christ could be the appropriate solution.

Despite their opposition, a relatively loud group of critics continue to be influenced by the very malevolent entities they criticize. Some are willing to acknowledge that the ‘Death Cult’ triumphed by claiming the superior moral position.

Despite their claims, these self-proclaimed conservatives forgo the traditional values of the Right, choosing instead to idolize material wealth (Mammon), child sacrifice (Moloch), or self-admiration (Narcissus).

Beneath their apparent focus on racial identity lies a strong lean towards Libertarianism. Essentially, they’re seeking opportunities to live outside of predominantly black neighborhoods and closer to predominantly white Christian communities.

They will not adhere to a single ethical ideology, which has demonstrated effectiveness in combating spiritual battles on behalf of the Western world and emerging victorious.

Fundamentally, what the nupagan group seeks is a return to pre-1965 demographics, yet with the moral values that emerged after 1968. However, these two situations cannot coexist due to their inherent contradictions.

A Church Father put it this way: “Any man who questions whether God exists does so primarily due to his own reasons for wanting to.

The compelling allure of vice, its ability to cloud judgment, and the sorrowful reality of shared resources collectively form a powerful case against democratic systems that prioritize liberty.

In a democratic system that values personal opinion as the standard of goodness, a large proportion of voters tend to cast their ballots based on what is beneficial to them financially, in terms of food and sustenance, or regarding their own personal desires.

Since democracy tends to address all its problems by calling for even more democracy, it eventually finds itself trapped in a cycle that mirrors our current predicament.

Reexamining the issue often leads to finding the correct solution. The proposal that both progressives (Wokists) and traditionalists (wignats) criticize, for contrasting reasons, seems particularly valid.

However, many millennials on platform X express dissatisfaction with Christianity, stating they long for a traditional or grounded church to join. Until then, they prefer to immerse themselves in personal fitness and self-admiration at the gym, and entertainment on adult content platforms like Pornhub.

However, their shallow, consumer-oriented perspectives contribute to the criticisms leveled by BoomerLibs and nupagans against the Church. This is because both groups tend to confuse religion and politics, failing to recognize that politics is a result of religious beliefs, not the other way around.

As a movie reviewer, I find myself reflecting on the profound impact that culture has on politics, echoing the sentiments of Andrew Breitbart with his famous phrase, “Politics is downstream from culture.” In this film, we witness how various societal currents shape political landscapes and influence decisions made at the highest levels. It’s a thought-provoking exploration of power dynamics that leaves us pondering the interplay between culture and politics – a must-see for those who appreciate insightful cinema!

But again, you can’t spell “culture” without “cult”.

It’s a point that seems to elude both modernist groups on the left and those on the right. This is because, when individual taste becomes the only standard for value, even deeply held beliefs like religious ones can appear as nothing more than consumer goods.

Reframing thoughts, I often ponder about the concept commonly known as “the marketplace of ideas.” This idea implies that ideas are similar to goods in a market, traded and valued based on their perceived worth. As an enthusiast, I can’t help but question this analogy, wondering if ideas aren’t more than just commodities to be bought and sold.

In that contaminated ground, the Death Cult thrived. Genuine opposition to Wokism struggles to flourish in such a toxic environment.

Here’s an idea: Approach religion with intellectual ingrity.

If you’re serious about finding truth, first acknowledge that it’s not up for a vote.

Truth binds in conscience, and breaking it is moral treachery.

Western morality is primarily defined by Christianity, even though it might not be politically correct to acknowledge this fact.

Politics reflects societal values and beliefs, which are often deeply rooted in religious teachings. Therefore, it’s not appropriate for political analysts to criticize or judge the Church, as their perspective may be limited and biased towards politics rather than spirituality.

Religion is misused as a political pawn by some, leading to foolish actions. And this is the reason they have not made progress and never will.

Politicizing religion often leads to mistakes, which is why those who do so have not been successful and likely won’t be.

Attempting to prioritize matters of faith, dealing with everlasting goals, over political issues, centered on immediate concerns, simply won’t work.

They fail to understand that nothing man-made, such as philosophies, countries, or ethnicities, hold inherent value or purpose. Instead, these entities serve a greater purpose – ultimately glorifying their creator, God.

“Seek ye first the Kingdom of God.”

That’s valuable guidance. Any political movement won’t succeed in its objectives if it doesn’t first establish the right priorities.

Experience The Burned Book in Audio!

Get the highly anticipated audiobook DRM-free, only at the Kairos Publications Store!