Star Trek’s Woke Transformation Sparks Backlash

by

Star Trek, looking back and presently, serves as a model for a brighter tomorrow… I firmly believe that its principles are essential in today’s world.

If you’re a dedicated Star Trek enthusiast who managed to persevere through series such as “Discovery” and “Section 31,” it’s likely that you’ve noticed how certain academic perspectives and popular narrative styles have influenced the franchise.

Joshua Patton, a writer, recently expressed discontent towards the alleged “toxic fanbase” in Star Trek, which progressives often label as conservatives or individuals who oppose their modern interpretations of established entertainment franchises (referred to as “NuTrek” in Star Trek’s context).

Similar to numerous others expressing opinions online about Star Trek, Patton highlights what he perceives as the problematic nature of the franchise by emphasizing that it has traditionally focused on themes such as “diversity”, “science”, and “knowledge”…and that its past serves not as a blueprint, but rather a cautionary tale.

In a different phrasing, Patton asserts that “Star Trek,” both then and now, serves not only as a depiction but also as a plan for a more promising tomorrow. Given the state of the world today, he firmly believes we are in dire need of such a vision. He points out the dangers of escalating global climate change and the worrying authoritarian tendencies of the current U.S. administration as pressing issues that necessitate the ideals presented by “Star Trek.

It seems that Patton is expressing this sentiment now primarily because he, along with many others, particularly academics, find it hard to accept Donald Trump’s return to office and the increased backing he has received. Despite numerous attempts to remove him both politically and personally.

For Nutrack, there’s a persistent issue. It’s not just about the poor writing, noticeably in “Discovery” and “Section 31”, but also because modern creators seem overly keen on tying their work to present times. They follow in Patton’s footsteps, thinking this connection is “essential more than ever.

Is it truly more hazardous now compared to when the Original Series premiered, or even during The Next Generation era, or Enterprise times?

Star Trek: The Original Series (often abbreviated as TOS) was first broadcast during the peak of the Cold War, shortly after the Cuban Missile Crisis, and ended just prior to the escalation of the Vietnam War. Star Trek: The Next Generation (TNG) started airing during the same Cold War era, and Star Trek: Enterprise premiered almost immediately following the September 11, 2001 events.

Regrettably, there’s a phenomenon known as “Trump Anxiety Syndrome,” where some individuals perceive Donald Trump as posing a danger equivalent to a nuclear conflict.

In a subtle nod, NuTrek’s “Strange New World” premiere didn’t show Captain Pike explicitly warning an advanced alien civilization, but it did depict him advising them against following Earth’s destructive path. Footage from the January 6 Capitol riot served as a catalyst for the portrayal of a second civil war, which escalated into World War III. Essentially, that’s what happened.

In simpler terms, Patton emphasizes that we should appreciate and trust science and expertise more, as excessive doubt can be harmful. This includes acknowledging the benefits of vaccines, which some people question, and rejecting outlandish theories like those who believe the Earth is flat.

Why on earth do people now harbor such an “unfounded distrust” towards vaccines? Can Patton clarify what a woman is? Why would individuals be skeptical of experts who think Trump poses a serious risk to just about anything imaginable … but remained silent about Joe Biden?

Why do people today have such a strong mistrust towards vaccines? What does Patton mean by the term “woman”? Why would some people doubt experts who consider Trump a significant danger on many issues … but didn’t say much about Joe Biden?

It’s fascinating to ponder over the individuals who once predicted cities submerged beneath water or the absence of snow due to global warming. Yet, here we are, with many cities still standing and plenty of snowfall each year. One might wonder how often such mispredictions are allowed to occur?

In the final season of “Star Trek: The Next Generation” (1994), the series abandoned an unrealistic connection to climate change, as depicted in the episode “Force of Nature.” Here, two extraterrestrial scientists tried to persuade Captain Picard and the crew of the Enterprise that warp travel was causing harm to the cosmic structure. From then on, for several episodes, a limit of warp 5 speed was set, with exceptions only during emergencies.

However, despite being discussed initially, this topic seems to have been forgotten or set aside. It wasn’t revisited even in the distant future depicted in the last few seasons of “Discovery,” where characters often expressed concern over an issue affecting warp speed… a problem that…

Though it was briefly touched upon, this matter appears to have been overlooked or not pursued further. It wasn’t mentioned again in the later seasons of “Discovery,” where characters frequently complained about a difficulty with warp drive… a predicament that…

In Patton’s statement (X account bio pictured), he emphasizes Star Trek’s theme of embracing endless diversity in countless forms. However, it’s essential to note that while they appreciate the richness of Earth and alien civilizations, those within Starfleet adhere to a common set of guidelines. Similarly, any planet aiming to join the Federation must follow these same principles.

A “uniform set of rules” is seen as fundamentally contradictory by today’s progressive thinkers. They might argue that Starfleet admission tests are a form of “systemic bias,” rooted in white supremacy. Instead, they would advocate for Starfleet ships to reflect the diversity found on Earth and other planets, ensuring a balanced representation across races, genders, and sexual orientations.

Patton points out that the intention behind creating “Star Trek” was to alter negative views towards immigrants, transgender people, and other groups who have faced historical discrimination.

Read the full report here.

Read More

2025-03-13 14:45