Senator Lummis Issues Stark Warning: FDIC’s Alleged Cover-Up of Operation Choke Point 2.0 Could Lead to Criminal Charges!

Senator Cynthia Lummis from Wyoming has sternly cautioned the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), accusing them of misconduct related to “Operation Choke Point 2.0” (OCP 2.0). The senator asserts that FDIC personnel might be participating in the concealment or destruction of vital papers associated with this operation, which supposedly intends to restrict banking services for cryptocurrency enterprises.

On January 16, Lummis penned a letter to FDIC Chair Marty Gruenberg, emphasizing the need for an immediate stop to any interference with pertinent documents. She made it clear that if staff members were found to be obstructing Senate oversight or destroying evidence, she would swiftly refer the matter to the Department of Justice. Notably, Gruenberg has announced his resignation, increasing the sense of urgency in this situation.

Inside sources at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) have come forward with troubling claims, such as concealing data from decision-makers and intimidation tactics towards staff who aimed to disclose documents to the U.S. Senate. Senator Lummis emphasized these concerns.

It’s forbidden and not tolerated. Make sure your team stops damaging everything and halts any retaliatory activities right away.

Court Battles and Allegations of Bad Faith

The ongoing debate about OCP 2.0 has led to legal disputes from significant figures in the cryptocurrency industry. Notably, Coinbase, a prominent cryptocurrency exchange, has filed a lawsuit against the FDIC, seeking access to crucial documents like the so-called “temporary halt directive.” This document is said to have instructed financial institutions to discontinue relationships with crypto businesses.

Even though a judge mandated the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to hand over the required documents, Coinbase claimed that many parts of the information were heavily blacked out. A subsequent court order also rebuked the FDIC for acting unethically, demanding complete transparency. Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s top legal executive, characterized recent document releases as evidence of a cover-up, with fresh disclosures surfacing only under intense judicial examination.

Lummis’ instruction is aimed at safeguarding records starting from January 2022, encompassing various topics like the FDIC’s oversight of digital currencies, disciplinary measures, and inter-departmental communications. Any documents labeled as “crypto,” “digital currency,” or similar terms should be saved, underscoring the extensive reach of this undertaking.

1. Moreover, the FDIC’s involvement in the shutdown of Signature Bank and Silvergate Bank has sparked interest, intensifying rumors about the agency’s actions under OCP 2.0. Senator Lummis has called for an immediate halt to any retaliatory actions against whistleblowers, demonstrating the Senate’s dedication to openness.

A Warning of Consequences

Senator Lummis left no room for misunderstanding, stating plainly that any intentional elimination of evidence or hindrance to investigations would face immediate legal penalties. (She put it this way:)

If it’s discovered that you or your team intentionally damaged evidence or attempted to hinder the Senate’s investigations, such actions could lead to immediate referrals for potential criminal charges to the United States Department of Justice.

Due to the involvement of numerous parties, the OCP 2.0 has become a focal point in the escalating conflict between regulatory bodies and the rapidly expanding cryptocurrency sector. The accusations of document destruction and intimidation tactics against those who expose wrongdoing have further fueled the mounting anxieties about the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s management of this issue.

Read More

2025-01-17 00:49