Escape From L.A. Is an Underappreciated John Carpenter Movie

by

As a seasoned gamer with over three decades under my belt, I can confidently say that Escape From L.A. holds a special place in my heart, much like a rusty old car that somehow still manages to get me where I need to go. The film, released back in ’96, was a refreshing sequel to the iconic Escape From New York, with Kurt Russell once again donning the leather jacket and shades as Snake Plissken.

Back in 1996, John Carpenter at last directed a sequel for one of his movies. Although it’s often considered unsuccessful, the film titled “Escape From L.A.” offers an enjoyable continuation from the 1981 classic “Escape From New York“. It’s worth giving this sequel a bit more recognition.

In a new action-packed adventure, Kurt Russell reprises his role as Snake Plissken, a government operative tasked with an extreme mission. His objective: infiltrate the lawless island of Los Angeles, populated by society’s most dangerous elements. Inside this chaos, he must locate and recover a control unit for a catastrophic weapon to avert nuclear devastation. However, as always, the challenge is far from straightforward.

As a gamer, I teamed up with Russell in an epic adventure, where Steve Buscemi took on the role of the slick, underhanded Map to the Stars Eddie. Pam Grier became Hershe Las Palmas, a character full of charm and mystery. Peter Fonda was Pipeline, adding depth and intrigue to our quest. Lastly, Bruce Campbell brought the demented energy of the Surgeon General of L.A. to life, making each encounter more thrilling.

John Carpenter has worked on follow-ups to his movies in the past, including Halloween 2, however, Escape From L.A. stands alone as the one sequel he personally oversaw. This fact is regrettable for several reasons.

A Less Than Sweet Escape

As a die-hard fan, I’d share this: “I can’t help but reflect on the making of ‘Escape From L.A.’, which came with a whopping $50 million price tag. Unfortunately, it only managed to recoup half that at the box office after a rough critical reception. Keep in mind, computer-generated imagery (CGI) was still fairly novel for many studios back then, and Buena Vista Visual Effects hadn’t dabbled in digital effects before. Consequently, ‘Escape From L.A.’ faced heavy criticism for its subpar CGI.”

15 years after its predecessor, Escape from L.A. is often judged more by what people expect it to be compared to what it actually is. It seems that John Carpenter’s style was becoming less compatible with the evolving Hollywood landscape as the 90s approached, and Escape from L.A. doesn’t make things easier with its sharp critique of Hollywood and the typical shenanigans of the film industry.

“Escape From L.A. is a film that may seem silly at first glance, but it’s actually quite intelligent in its critique of Hollywood and sequels. The reason it can be tough to watch goes beyond its visual flaws. It might appear as though it’s playing it safe for Carpenter, but I believe it’s just as innovative and creative as his work from the ’70s and ’80s. The budget constraints make it harder to fully appreciate this creativity.”

Life After L.A.

After this, the carpenter only directed a few more films, and unfortunately, they all faced a comparable lack of success both critically and commercially. One of his least impressive works is “Vampires,” while “Ghosts of Mars” is a bit of a chaotic fun film, and “The Ward” is generally forgettable.

Instead of sitting behind the director’s chair, Carpenter finds immense satisfaction in his current lifestyle. He’s been creating soundtracks for modern Halloween movies, performing his music globally, and after his dreams of directing a Dead Space film were dashed, he’s assumed control over a video game called John Carpenter’s Toxic Commando.

Read More

2024-08-10 00:10