Did MicroStrategy Mess Up By Choosing Bitcoin Over Ethereum? Analyst Weighs In

As a seasoned crypto investor with a keen eye for market trends and a knack for spotting opportunities, I’m thrilled about the SEC’s recent approval of eight spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs). This is a significant milestone that paves the way for institutional adoption of Ethereum, and it could potentially bring immense rewards to early investors.


This morning, the SEC in the United States gave its approval to 19b-4 applications for eight Ethereum ETFs. Consequently, these ETFs are now a step closer to being launched, which is eagerly anticipated by institutional investors as Ethereum, the second most valuable digital asset, gains wider acceptance.

After a prolonged period of doubt, the regulatory body surprised the crypto community this week by requesting corrections to the applications of those seeking to launch spot Bitcoin ETFs. This unexpected move came less than half a year after giving its approval for such products.

Did MicroStrategy Make A Mistake Choosing Bitcoin Over Ethereum?

As a researcher studying the cryptocurrency market, I’ve noticed an intriguing development: Ethereum-based Spot ETFs are predicted to be launched imminently. This got me thinking about MicroStrategy’s decision, made by its former CEO Michael Saylor, to invest heavily in Bitcoin instead.

I, as an analyst, can share that Bitcoin Treasuries reports MicroStrategy as the leading publicly-traded corporation in terms of Bitcoin ownership. With approximately 214,400 BTC, their holdings are valued at more than $14 billion according to current market prices.

Did MicroStrategy Mess Up By Choosing Bitcoin Over Ethereum? Analyst Weighs In
 

As a researcher, I’m examining the recent development with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) considering spot Ethereum Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). In light of this potential shift, I’d like to explore a hypothetical situation. If MicroStrategy had opted for Ethereum instead of Bitcoin for their investment, their current holding would have been valued at approximately $19 billion based on spot rates.

If MicroStrategy had opted to purchase rather than hold and stake, their accumulated value from that investment would have surpassed $4 billion by this level. By May 2024’s end, the worth of their staked holdings would have exceeded $20.9 billion.

ETH Trading At A Huge Discount: Will It Replicate BTC’s Success?

 

After the successful launch and market performance of Bitcoin spot ETFs, it’s clear that Ethereum’s current market price may be underestimated. Following a temporary decrease in early January, Bitcoin prices skyrocketed, pushing Ethereum to reach an peak of $4,100. However, Bitcoin reached new heights, breaking through the $70,000 barrier and setting all-time highs near $74,000.

Did MicroStrategy Mess Up By Choosing Bitcoin Over Ethereum? Analyst Weighs In

As a crypto investor, I’m excited to share that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved 19b-4 forms from eight different Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) issuers, including heavyweights like BlackRock and Fidelity. This means that all the necessary regulatory requirements have been met for these ETFs, except for one final step: the approval of S-1 registration statements.

Despite this, it’s worth mentioning that Ethereum ETF providers won’t be staking their ETH but instead will keep it with a trusted custodian for safekeeping.

Read More

Sorry. No data so far.

2024-05-25 00:40