Born Out of Sexism, Not Feminism

by

Actress Dame Helen Mirren has sparked discussions about how women are depicted in the James Bond series, labeling it as “soaked” and rooted in deep-seated sexism. In a chat with The Standard, she candidly shared her dislike for the franchise, stating, “I’ve never been a fan of James Bond. I’ve never appreciated how women were portrayed in the James Bond universe… The entire concept of James Bond reeks and originates from a profound sexism.

Instead of advocating for a female James Bond, Mirren proposes that filmmakers concentrate on authentic tales about remarkable women in espionage, similar to those involved in the French Resistance.

It’s well-known that the James Bond series has long been a source of male fantasy, featuring glamorous women, thrilling escapades, and intense espionage. However, labeling the franchise as sexist in its entirety may be too simplistic. From the onset, Bond women were not merely decorative; they were clever, shrewd, and self-reliant. For instance, Honey Ryder from Dr. No was self-taught and resourceful, Pussy Galore in Goldfinger ran her own aviation business, and Tracy di Vicenzo in On Her Majesty’s Secret Service was a multifaceted character who matched Bond in intelligence and became his wife.

Mirren contends that these depictions are questionable due to their focus on male desires. However, it’s essential to note that escapism is not gender-specific. Women too have their own forms of wish fulfillment – just observe the widespread appeal of “Twilight,” “Fifty Shades of Grey,” or Hallmark Christmas movies. These narratives frequently revolve around strong males who either rescue or court women, addressing a fundamental longing for protection and companionship. However, James Bond also addresses such fantasies but turns the tables for men, enabling them to envision themselves as smooth, masculine figures saving the day.

It’s quite puzzling that Mirren seems so devoid of humor during this discussion, opting instead to zero in on the shortcomings rather than acknowledging the progression of the Bond franchise. For instance, recent Bond films like Skyfall and No Time to Die have significantly improved the roles of female characters, granting them more autonomy. Yes, there were certainly outdated tropes in earlier Bond movies, but they’ve evolved over time, mirroring shifts in societal views on gender dynamics.

I find myself in agreement with Mirren’s critique, but it seems she may have overlooked the essence of James Bond. Bond wasn’t designed to be a feminist symbol; instead, his purpose was to provide entertainment. If her tastes don’t align with this classic franchise, it might just not resonate with her. That’s perfectly fine. Not all art is meant for everyone. However, I can’t help but feel that her dismissal of an entire series enjoyed by countless millions seems a tad too harsh, given its significant impact on popular culture.

It’s important to remember that escapism is meant to bring joy – a space where people can immerse themselves in dreams they might not dare to chase in reality. Be it James Bond saving the world or Snow White finding her prince, these tales resonate with our shared yearnings for excitement, love, and heroics. Labeling them as “sexist” or “troublesome” diminishes their enchantment and distances those who simply seek entertainment from them.

Read More

2025-04-02 18:30