As a seasoned researcher with a penchant for deciphering the complexities of the financial world, I find myself intrigued by this latest development between Binance and the US SEC. Having navigated through numerous legal battles within the cryptocurrency landscape, I’ve learned to appreciate the nuances that make each case unique.
In a recent legal maneuver, Binance – the globally dominant cryptocurrency exchange boasting over $50 billion in daily trades – together with its founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ), has asked the court to dismiss an ongoing lawsuit initiated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The reason for this request stems from Binance’s belief that the SEC has not provided sufficient evidence to prove its accusations meet the Howey test, validate claims against third-party tokens, or substantiate its demand for disgorgement before moving forward to the discovery phase.
According to court documents filed in the District Court of Columbia, Binance and its founder CZ have asked for the case to be dismissed. They claim that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has not been able to prove each specific transaction that meets the criteria of an investment contract as defined by the Howey test.
Additionally, it was pointed out that the agency did not offer a straightforward approach for the court to discern between cryptocurrency tokens classified as investment contracts and other commodities like Bitcoin and Ethereum.
In simpler terms, the exchange argues that the SEC has not clearly explained why certain transactions violated securities laws or how token sales involving developers should be categorized as investment contracts. Furthermore, Binance points out that the SEC hasn’t demonstrated a need to act without considering the developers of third-party tokens. Consequently, the exchange contends that it is unjust for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to focus on just ten specific tokens among many.
As a crypto investor, I’m sharing some insights about the recent developments with Binance. Binance has stated that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) hasn’t provided evidence of any financial damage caused by the exchange – a crucial factor for seeking disgorgement. Consequently, Binance and its CEO, CZ, have petitioned the court to dismiss the SEC’s allegations against them, emphasizing the lack of proof in this regard.
Binance vs SEC Lawsuit Dismissal Soon?
In their latest submission, the crypto exchange disputes the Securities and Exchange Commission’s assertion that transactions involving BNB on Binance.US constituted investments. Moreover, the exchange challenges the SEC’s token-specific approach, claiming it provides insufficient proof for its arguments.
Additionally, Binance argues that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has yet to establish a clear set of guidelines for distinguishing between market tokens classified as securities and those categorized as not. The filing also highlights that Binance.US has not faced any registration claims beyond secondary sales.
According to their argument, the case made by the SEC regarding its claims under the Exchange Act cannot move forward merely on the basis of staking activities. Furthermore, they contend that Binance.US did not list any securities.
Currently, as a crypto investor, I’ve noticed that Binance’s native BNB Coin experienced some positive momentum today, but it encountered resistance at around $700. However, once it successfully breaks past this level, the BNB coin might surge towards $1,000, according to analyst predictions.
Read More
- DEXE PREDICTION. DEXE cryptocurrency
- WIF PREDICTION. WIF cryptocurrency
- From Season 4 Renewed With Release Date Window & Episode Count
- FLOKI PREDICTION. FLOKI cryptocurrency
- TURBO PREDICTION. TURBO cryptocurrency
- SEI PREDICTION. SEI cryptocurrency
- ZEN PREDICTION. ZEN cryptocurrency
- FIS PREDICTION. FIS cryptocurrency
- XRD PREDICTION. XRD cryptocurrency
- GLMR PREDICTION. GLMR cryptocurrency
2024-12-24 20:12