As a seasoned gamer and history enthusiast who has traversed the digital battlefields of countless historical epochs, I find myself intrigued by the recent debacle surrounding Yasuke’s samurai status in Assassin’s Creed Shadows. Having delved into the annals of history to uncover the tales of many a warrior, I must say that this particular squabble has left me somewhat perplexed.
If you can’t wait for Assassin’s Creed Shadows, you might already be aware that one of the main characters is Yasuke, an African man who served the Japanese feudal lord Oda Nobunaga in the 16th century. However, there’s been quite a stir online over whether Yasuke was actually a samurai, and opinions have really heated up on this topic.
Yasuke’s Samurai Status: A Debate for the Scholars
In scholarly circles, there’s ongoing discussion about whether Yasuke truly qualified as a samurai. Some historians like Thomas Lockley believe he was one of Nobunaga’s warriors, given that the term ‘samurai’ originally referred to any warrior serving a lord. However, when Ubisoft introduced Yasuke as their main character, this sparked debate among the general public. Some people criticized it as an unhistorical move or a forced attempt at diversity.
Subreddit Moderators Say “Enough is Enough”
As a lifelong fan of the Assassin’s Creed series, I’ve always appreciated the balance between historical accuracy and creative freedom that the games manage to achieve. However, the recent controversy surrounding Yasuke’s samurai status has left me somewhat disappointed.
Ubisoft’s Apology And The Community’s Reaction
In their latest apology, Ubisoft admitted there had been discussions about Yasuke’s samurai status in the game and explained that another main character is a Japanese shinobi. Meanwhile, moderators of the subreddit contend that many criticisms leveled against Yasuke’s presence were not genuine historical concerns but rather underhanded attempts to cause trouble.
A Call To Enjoy The Game For What It Is
The mods’ warning was straightforward: Assassin’s Creed should not be used as a historical textbook. They encouraged players to appreciate the game for its engrossing atmosphere and allow it to stimulate their curiosity about real-world history independently. Furthermore, any criticism or nitpicking regarding Yasuke’s presence in the game would be promptly deleted, and persistent violators would face permanent bans.
In summary, the subreddit has moved past the argument and is eager to delve into the game’s main attraction: immersing ourselves in a thrilling, although unrealistic, portrayal of history. If you’re still pondering over Yasuke’s samurai standing, perhaps it’s best to continue that debate elsewhere.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-07-31 14:09