League of Legends Players Are Accusing Artist Of Using AI For No Reason

by

Allegations are circulating about artificial intelligence involvement in the creation of the Prestige Spirit Blossom Lux artwork within the game, League of Legends…

Why People Suspect AI

The debut of the Prestige Spirit Blossom Lux splash art in League of Legends has sparked a new round of allegations against Riot Games artist Alsie Lau. Users on TikTok and Twitter claim that she used AI to create the artwork, although there’s an abundance of proof suggesting otherwise.

The illustrator employed on a full-time basis at Riot, who climbed up the career ladder from an internship, has once again become embroiled in debate surrounding artificial intelligence, marking her second such incident.

Previous concerns have been expressed regarding her involvement with the champions Porcelain Irelia and Battle Dove Seraphine in the past.

This critique focuses on elements that appear reminiscent of artificial intelligence in the artwork, such as intense illumination, more fluid than realistic body shapes, and expressions some people describe as lacking depth or emotion.

Additionally, viewers commented on the depiction of metal and textiles, implying that it appeared devoid of human emotion or sensitivity, a critique not typically grounded in traditional art analysis or proof of artificial intelligence involvement.

None of the claims have ever been substantiated, yet the accusations persist.

How to Spot AI Art – And Why This Art Isn’t

As AI continues to advance, it becomes increasingly challenging to differentiate AI-generated art from human-created pieces. However, AI-produced artwork often bears unique, identifiable traits that set it apart.

Common indicators of AI art are:

  • Most importantly! Inconsistent line work, where lines and shapes just end without reason
  • Unrealistic light sources that seem “all over the place”
  • Focus issues where objects are blurred, when they wouldn’t be
  • Repetitive patterns and vague shapes in backgrounds

None of these indicators are present in Alsie Lau’s Prestige Spirit Blossom Lux artwork.

Lau hasn’t directly responded to the allegations on her social media, yet she did address a comment from a fan.

She wrote:

“I literally spent three months staying in my room and hand-painting every detail, flower petal, and particle,

Lau’s work exhibits unmistakable signs of artisanal skill, featuring deliberate line patterns, harmonious illumination, and intricate, tactile depictions.

The piece of art follows a well-defined visual structure, demonstrating a profound grasp of human anatomy and fundamental design concepts. Such intricate detail and purposeful creation are, at present, beyond the reach of modern artificial intelligence systems.

Lau openly discussed her creative journey, revealing preliminary sketches, color experiments, and snapshots of her development along the way.

Over 350 hours were spent meticulously working on the creation, with numerous revisions, which is a testament to the dedication and creativity of human artists, rather than being a product of an AI’s generation pipeline.

The Irony of AI Paranoia

Interestingly enough, it’s pieces like Lau’s that are commonly employed to educate AI models initially. Artwork originating from games such as League of Legends, Gacha Games, and their kin is frequently gathered by AI systems for training datasets. This situation has led some artists to be criticized for imitating the very AI that had earlier imitated them.

Respecting the Craft

The increasing criticism directed at Alsie Lau signifies a mounting apprehension about AI in artistic realms. The ongoing debate also underscores a concerning pattern: the surge of “vibe-based” criticisms, where online commentators often accuse based on personal feelings rather than concrete evidence.

In games such as Foamstars and Call of Duty: Black Oops, the use of AI has received criticism. However, those who quickly condemn without thorough investigation may unintentionally harm genuine game developers. These allegations can persist, even if they’re completely false.

Final Thoughts

The concern about AI is warranted, as it poses a risk to jobs, originality in art, and the significance of human creativity. However, this fear should not be used as a means to unfairly criticize dedicated artists. Instead, now more than ever, we need to emphasize media literacy and critical thinking skills.

It’s understandable that people are worried about AI because it might take jobs, affect original art, and devalue human creativity. But using this fear as a reason to attack artists who work hard is not right. Instead, we should focus on understanding media better and thinking critically.

In their absence, fear might transform into a malicious pursuit of false accusations, ultimately causing damage to those pioneering the art of visual narrative.

Read More

2025-06-04 22:10