As a seasoned crypto investor with over a decade of experience navigating the volatile and dynamic digital asset market, I find myself closely following the ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the SEC. Having witnessed the rise and fall of numerous altcoins and ICOs, I can’t help but see this case as a potential turning point for the entire crypto industry.
In the next six days, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has the opportunity to file an appeal in their ongoing legal dispute with Ripple, a well-known blockchain company that deals with XRP.
As an analyst, I’ve been monitoring recent developments regarding XRP, and it appears that there could be a potential shift in its regulatory landscape. Initial reports hint towards the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) potentially contesting the July 2023 ruling by US District Judge Analisa Torres, which deemed certain sales of XRP as not violating securities laws. However, it’s important to note that Ripple had previously agreed to a $125 million settlement with the SEC over these same allegations. This could indicate an ongoing dialogue or further clarification required in this area.
This decision is widely seen as a significant win for the cryptocurrency sector, demonstrating that these digital assets do not contravene U.S. securities regulations, contrary to the SEC’s perspective. In an interview with Fox Business, ex-SEC lawyers hinted at a possible appeal, suggesting that the agency remains determined to maintain its control over the crypto industry. Marc Powers, a former SEC enforcement attorney, expressed this view.
It seems likely that the SEC will challenge this decision. Such a move is probably due to their desire to prevent the programmatic trading analysis from holding ground. This ruling could potentially introduce inconsistencies among decisions made by district court judges and the Second Circuit.
A legal expert from the Securities and Exchange Commission, who chose to remain unnamed, stated that the decision was questionable and lacked legal basis. This individual suggested that many securities lawyers, regardless of their view on cryptocurrency, would likely concur that the verdict was not widely respected within the profession.
Contrarily, legal representatives for the cryptocurrency sector vehemently oppose this stance. They argue that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) might be expending resources unnecessarily with an increased likelihood of failure. Jeremy Hogan, a partner at the law firm Hogan & Hogan, expressed this viewpoint.
Given that the SEC lost the case, it’s understandable why they believe the ruling is incorrect. Instead, what the SEC ought to ponder at this juncture is if appealing the decision aligns with their primary mission of safeguarding investors and fostering capital development.
SEC Faces Criticism on Crypto Regulatory Enforcement
Multiple U.S. legislators have criticized Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler for implementing regulations using an enforcement-based strategy. In a recent hearing at the House Financial Services Committee, Gensler struggled to respond to challenging inquiries posed by Republican representatives.
Hogan points out that because the Ripple case involves more than just conventional XRP sales – a wider range of facts and situations – it may not serve as the ideal case for the SEC to pursue an appeal, should their intention be to focus solely on such sales.
Marc Fagel, a former SEC attorney said that the regulator should focus on going after top exchanges instead of Ripple.
“The speaker points out that Ripple is only one issuer, whereas exchanges pose a more extensive systemic risk for investors. Additionally, the legal situation is uncertain. The question arises as to which case should be presented in court by the agency: the Ripple case or should the SEC wait for an exchange case such as Coinbase’s appeal? The latter would have a stronger potential to directly address the issue of secondary sales.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-10-01 10:45