As a seasoned Outlander fan with over two decades of following this intricate saga, I must say that Season 5’s conclusion of Ed Speleers’ character, Stephen Bonnet, was both expected and satisfying. However, the execution (pun intended) of his demise stirred some controversy among fellow fans.
In simple terms, “Outlander” Season 5 marked the departure of the villainous character, Stephen Bonnet, played by Ed Speleers. This season was essentially focused on concluding his storyline.
In the TV series, the storyline largely followed the novel’s conclusion regarding Bonnet. He was apprehended and faced execution by drowning, which Brianna chose to carry out in the narrative. However, unlike in the book where she went out to shoot him when no one else was present, in the show, she performed this act from a distance, showcasing her remarkable marksmanship skills at the same time.
The alteration isn’t significant enough to impact me greatly. Personally, I’m unaffected. However, some devoted Outlander fans have expressed dissatisfaction with the latest plot developments in the series.
Why didn’t Brianna kill Bonnet on the island in Outlander?
Fans often wonder why Brianna didn’t use her opportunities to eliminate Bonnet on the island instead of letting him live. After all, she had several chances throughout their encounter, so what prevented her from acting upon them?
Some people believe his death occurred far too suddenly. Others, on the other hand, argue that Bonnet deserved a slower, watery demise. It’s puzzling why Brianna might show compassion towards him, given all his wrongdoings, to the point of shooting him herself.
The actions of Brianna stem from how Diana Gabaldon crafted the story. She exhibited a touch of compassion from Brianna, but it was more than just mercy. When Bree spared Bonnet’s life in a manner that alleviated his deepest fear of death, she also did so to find closure. By making certain he perished, she guaranteed that he wouldn’t haunt her again.
In essence, the focus wasn’t on Bonnet receiving a compassionate end, but rather Brianna finding resolution in this specific narrative arc. The figure who tormented her dreams and potentially endangered Jemmy was forever eliminated. No longer was there any danger from him to her or her family. What she needed most was that sense of finality.
Is it not more feasible to let Jamie perform the act on the island instead of having him taken by the authorities? After all, this scenario might imply that Jamie’s innocence remains unquestioned. Given that everyone recognized Bonnet as a wicked individual, and the authorities confirmed it, Bree could take charge of the situation herself.
Stay up to date with everything Outlander and more Facebook and Twitter
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-09-21 15:37