Ripple vs SEC Battle Heats Up as Agency Fights to Reveal XRP Secrets

As an analyst with a background in financial regulation and securities law, I find the latest development in the Ripple vs SEC lawsuit to be a significant turning point in the case. The SEC’s opposition to Ripple’s motion to seal evidence from public view is a clear indication of the commission’s determination to make this a transparent and open legal process.


The SEC has contested Ripple‘s request to keep certain pieces of evidence in the Ripple versus SEC legal battle hidden from public view.

Previously, Ripple made a request to the court to redact certain evidence presented in the SEC’s remedies briefing submitted on March 22, as well as other related documents. The company identified five specific exhibits for redaction. Yet, the SEC has countered with a motion asking the court to make public the business details contained within Ripple’s remedies briefing.

Based on Ripple’s assessment, disclosing financial reports, information about post-complaint XRP institutional sales, and other confidential data could potentially put the company in a precarious position.

SEC Calls Ripple’s Request ‘Unlawful’

According to the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s recent disclosure, made public on May 21st, Ripple’s effort to withhold their financial and securities sales details from the public can be considered an act of lawlessness.

The commission acknowledged that it had no objection to sealing certain exhibits in Ripple’s petition. Nevertheless, it emphasized that financial data and related particulars are crucial elements in the proposed relief the SEC is seeking.

If the court fully grants Ripple’s redaction request, the SEC is concerned that crucial information vital to its decisions during the remedies phase will remain concealed from public view. This, in turn, could impact the court’s comprehension of the case’s broader implications and potentially influence the severity of any penalties imposed.

Based on the US SEC’s standpoint, Ripple’s present assets could influence the magnitude of the penalty. Additionally, Ripple’s recent sales are significant for both injunctive relief and penalties. The revenues and expenses play a crucial role in determining disgorgement. Lastly, the extent of discounts granted to certain institutional investors is essential in assessing the severity of investor harm.

Ripple vs SEC Battle Heats Up as Agency Fights to Reveal XRP Secrets

SEC’s Latest Filing

As an analyst, I’d rephrase the given text as follows: The regulator emphasized that Ripple has not successfully demonstrated how disclosing the specified details would lead to harm. Moreover, the SEC argues that the financial information and related documents are outdated, with much of it already accessible to the public. Consequently, I find it perplexing why Ripple insists on keeping these exhibits sealed.

XRP Price Jumps

During the same time frame, it’s important to mention that despite the SEC’s recent filing regarding Ripple, the XRP token has shown resilience. Its value has risen by 5% within the last day and is now priced at $0.535. Moreover, there has been a significant surge in trading volume for XRP, with over 150% more transactions taking place compared to the previous day. This surge suggests heightened investor interest and engagement with the token.

Read More

2024-05-21 11:07