As an experienced financial analyst, I have closely followed the ongoing legal battle between the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Kraken exchange over the latter’s alleged operation of an unregistered securities exchange. Based on my analysis of the available information, I believe that Kraken’s attorneys have raised valid concerns regarding the SEC’s jurisdiction and interpretation of the Howey test.
The lawyers for Kraken Cryptocurrency Exchange have responded to the SEC’s accusation in April, asking the court to throw out the claims against the exchange. Their filings, submitted on Thursday in the Northern District of California, argue that the SEC’s case, which alleges Kraken is operating an unregistered securities exchange, contains fundamental errors.
Kraken Questions SEC’s Legal Jurisdiction
In their latest response, the exchange argues that the SEC is overstepping its bounds by applying its authority beyond the scope defined by the Howey test. The Howey test establishes four key elements to identify securities: an investment of money, participation in a common enterprise, anticipation of profits, and contributions of others’ efforts. Kraken’s legal team asserts:
“The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is unable to meet Howey’s extra conditions requiring investments involving shared funds and anticipated profits derived from others’ efforts. Expanding the SEC’s jurisdiction based on these conditions could broadly impact various investment activities that were not originally within its purview. Such a substantial shift in financial regulation merits congressional debate rather than being determined in the courts.”
Kraken’s response further points out that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may be misunderstanding certain legal concepts. It proposes replacing the terms “ecosystem” and “investment concept” with “enterprise” and “investment contract,” respectively, for clearer understanding.
As a researcher studying securities regulations, I’d rephrase the given text as follows:
Kraken Enforcement Actions Since Last Year
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Kraken in November, claiming that the platform had been operating an unregistered securities exchange. According to the SEC’s press release, Kraken made hundreds of millions of dollars by facilitating the buying and selling of crypto asset securities since at least September 2018. The Commission labeled Kraken as an unlawful broker, dealer, and clearing agency. Furthermore, the SEC identified several cryptocurrencies listed on Kraken as securities, such as Polygon (MATIC), Solana (SOL), OMG Network (OMG), Decentraland (MANA), Algorand (ALGO), Filecoin (FIL), and Near (NEAR).
The SEC has levied charges against Kraken, claiming that they commingled user funds worth up to $33 billion. This means that the exchange reportedly used customers’ funds to cover its own expenses and engaged in other unlawful business practices, such as having weak internal controls. Kraken disputed these accusations, criticizing the SEC for lacking regulatory clarity and continuing with enforcement actions instead.
As a crypto investor, I’ve been following the developments between the SEC and Kraken closely. Back in February, Kraken reached a settlement agreement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over their offering of unregistered Staking-as-a-Service products to US users. According to the terms, Kraken must permanently discontinue this service and pay a hefty fine of $30 million.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-05-10 13:40